Skip to main content
· 5/12/2005

Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder

Citations

  • 111 P.3d 435
  • 210 Ariz. 393
  • 451 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 28
  • 2005 Ariz. App. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • party not entitled to attorney fees under A.R.S. § 12-2030 because § 39-121.02(B) was applicable, specific statute
  • noting, without discussion, that public records includes all records
  • involving records request by political consulting firm
  • no disclosure required when statute restricts access
  • involving records request by political consulting firm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Portley, Lankford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.