Priest v. Priest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A remainderman unquestionably is entitled to relief from threatened waste which impinges upon or impairs his remainder interest”
• “A remainderman unquestionably is entitled to relief from threatened waste which impinges upon or impairs his remainder interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Goddard
  E.D. Tennessee· 2010-07-28· cited 2×
• Jean E. Hood v. J. Daniel Freemon
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2007-01-03
• Elizabeth Doramus v. Rogers Group, Inc. and T.W. Comer
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-02-28

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nichols v. Guthrie
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1902-12-15· cited 22×
• Matthews v. Capshaw
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1902-12-15· cited 13×
• Ford v. Hurt
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1913-04-15· cited 7×
• Holley v. Marks
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1976-04-05· cited 5×
• Downing v. Johnson
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1867-12-15· cited 4×
• Crippled Children's Hospital School v. Camatsos
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1960-06-23· cited 2×