Priest v. Edmonds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to review defendant’s claim when trial court simply marked defen- dant’s motion to open ‘‘ ‘denied’ ’’ and could have done so for various reasons
• declining to review defendant’s claim when trial court simply marked defen- dant’s motion to open ‘‘ ‘denied’ ’’ and could have done so for various reasons
• articulation serves to clarify \the factual and legal basis [on] which the trial court rendered its decision\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• role of reviewing court ‘‘is not to guess at possibilities . . . but to review claims based on a complete factual record developed by a trial court’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• role of reviewing court ‘‘is not to guess at possibilities . . . but to review claims based on a complete factual record developed by a trial court’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).