Skip to main content
· 10/17/1991

Pries v. Watt

Citations

  • 410 S.E.2d 285
  • 186 W. Va. 49
  • 1991 W. Va. LEXIS 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • focusing upon whether nonresident defendant “has purposefully acted to obtain benefits or privileges in the forum state” in determining whether personal júrisdiction is proper
  • focusing upon whether nonresident defendant \has purposefully acted to obtain benefits or privileges in the forum state\ in determining whether personal jurisdiction is proper
  • suggesting consideration of various factors to aid in court’s assessment of personal jurisdiction
  • suggesting consideration of various factors to aid in court's assessment of personal jurisdiction
  • “[t]o what extent the defendant has minimum contacts depends upon the facts of the individual case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.