· 10/17/1991
Pries v. Watt
Citations
- 410 S.E.2d 285
- 186 W. Va. 49
- 1991 W. Va. LEXIS 161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- focusing upon whether nonresident defendant “has purposefully acted to obtain benefits or privileges in the forum state” in determining whether personal júrisdiction is proper
- focusing upon whether nonresident defendant \has purposefully acted to obtain benefits or privileges in the forum state\ in determining whether personal jurisdiction is proper
- suggesting consideration of various factors to aid in court’s assessment of personal jurisdiction
- suggesting consideration of various factors to aid in court's assessment of personal jurisdiction
- “[t]o what extent the defendant has minimum contacts depends upon the facts of the individual case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.