Pride v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the current sexual battery statute, “any penetration, no matter how slight, constitutes a completed sexual battery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-29· cited 23×
• D'Ambrosio v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-28· cited 21×
• Holland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-07· cited 15×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-07· cited 11×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-08· cited 11×
• Gleason v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-29· cited 7×
• Bain v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-25· cited 2×
• Fox v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-10· cited 2×
• Marles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-25· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Abreau
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-05-26· cited 198×
• State v. Wimberly
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-11· cited 137×
• Reddick v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-02-12· cited 33×
• Rease v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-09-04· cited 29×
• In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-09-24· cited 28×
• Wheat v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-30· cited 15×
• Boston v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-01· cited 13×
• Flint v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-15· cited 11×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-20· cited 11×