· 12/6/2005
Pride v. Lewis
Citations
- 179 S.W.3d 375
- 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823
- 2005 WL 3283729
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- changing date for closing on real estate transaction was not an acceptance, but a counteroffer
- “Any acceptance that includes new or variant terms from the offer presented amounts to a counter-offer and a rejection of the original offer.”
- “Any 10 acceptance that includes new or variant terms from the offer presented amounts to a counter-offer and a rejection of the original offer.”
- “Any acceptance that includes new or variant terms from the offer presented amounts to a counter-offer and a rejection of the original offer.” (quotation marks and citations omitted)
- “As a general rule, silence or inaction cannot constitute acceptance of an offer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ulrich, Breckenridge, Smart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.