Skip to main content
· 12/6/2005

Pride v. Lewis

Citations

  • 179 S.W.3d 375
  • 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823
  • 2005 WL 3283729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • changing date for closing on real estate transaction was not an acceptance, but a counteroffer
  • “Any acceptance that includes new or variant terms from the offer presented amounts to a counter-offer and a rejection of the original offer.”
  • “Any 10 acceptance that includes new or variant terms from the offer presented amounts to a counter-offer and a rejection of the original offer.”
  • “Any acceptance that includes new or variant terms from the offer presented amounts to a counter-offer and a rejection of the original offer.” (quotation marks and citations omitted)
  • “As a general rule, silence or inaction cannot constitute acceptance of an offer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ulrich, Breckenridge, Smart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.