Skip to main content
· 9/30/2002

Pride Companies, L.P. v. Johnson (In Re Pride Companies, L.P.)

Citations

  • 285 B.R. 366
  • 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 1090
  • 40 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 68
  • 2002 WL 31525616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “statutory construction and logic compel the conclusion that unsecured creditors may not recover post-petition attorneys’ fees”
  • principles of equitable distribution “should bar enforcement of contractual provisions that would permit one creditor — and not others — to charge the estate with legal expenses associated with a proceeding before the Bankruptcy Court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.