Skip to main content
· 6/22/1995

Priddy v. Shopko Corporation

Citations

  • 918 F. Supp. 358
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a retail establishment is not a place of public accommodation under Title II
  • holding that a retail establishment is not a place of public accommodation under Title II
  • holding that a retail establishment is not a place of public accommodation under Title II
  • dismissing cause of action brought under § 2000a where the plaintiff did not allege that the defendant’s facility was anything other than a general retail establishment
  • “The clear implication of [Section 2000a(b)(2)] is that Congress did not intend to include retail establishments” as places of public accommodation for purposes of Title II

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.