· 6/22/1995
Priddy v. Shopko Corporation
Citations
- 918 F. Supp. 358
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a retail establishment is not a place of public accommodation under Title II
- holding that a retail establishment is not a place of public accommodation under Title II
- holding that a retail establishment is not a place of public accommodation under Title II
- dismissing cause of action brought under § 2000a where the plaintiff did not allege that the defendant’s facility was anything other than a general retail establishment
- “The clear implication of [Section 2000a(b)(2)] is that Congress did not intend to include retail establishments” as places of public accommodation for purposes of Title II
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.