· 6/21/1982
Priddy v. Linson
Citations
- 32 Wash. App. 1010
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing a permanency judgment that was based on the mother’s mental-health condition when “nothing in the jurisdictional judgment” would have alerted the mother that she needed to address that condition
- declining to exercise de novo review because the court could resolve the “appeal based on a purely legal question — one that [was] not dependent on any disputed factual findings of the trial court”
- declining de novo review because the issue on appeal was purely legal
- the court may not rely on an unadjudicated personality disorder as a basis for continuing jurisdiction
- trial court can continue jurisdiction on basis “fairly implied” by jurisdictional judgment
- focus on adjudicated bases at continuation of permanency plan
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.