Skip to main content
· 6/21/1982

Priddy v. Linson

Citations

  • 32 Wash. App. 1010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing a permanency judgment that was based on the mother’s mental-health condition when “nothing in the jurisdictional judgment” would have alerted the mother that she needed to address that condition
  • declining to exercise de novo review because the court could resolve the “appeal based on a purely legal question — one that [was] not dependent on any disputed factual findings of the trial court”
  • declining de novo review because the issue on appeal was purely legal
  • the court may not rely on an unadjudicated personality disorder as a basis for continuing jurisdiction
  • trial court can continue jurisdiction on basis “fairly implied” by jurisdictional judgment
  • focus on adjudicated bases at continuation of permanency plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.