Prichep v. Prichep

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that CPLR section 208 applies where the plaintiff suffered from “presenile dementia” which was so severe that he could not tie his shoes or add two numbers together and had suffered from permanent cognitive and memory impairment
• applying insanity toll where plaintiff suffered from “presenile dementia” that rendered him unable to tie a necktie or add two numbers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).