Prichard v. Fulmer
Citations
- 25 N.M. 452
- 184 P. 529
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Where a complaint in a suit for attorney’s fees alleges that plaintiff was emrdoyed “to perform all services required to be performed by him in and about the foreclosure (of a mortgage) and the business incident thereto,” the right to compensation begins when the sale of the mortgaged premises is confirmed by the court, and not when the decree of foreclosure is signed. P. 454'</p> <p>2. A suit for attorney’s fees in such a case, begun within four years from the date of the order confirming the sale of the mortgaged premises, is not barred by the statute of limitations. P. 454</p> <p>3. Matters not called to the attention of the trial coul-t except as to questions oC jurisdiction cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. P. 455</p>
Judges: Parker, Raynolds, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sena v. SandersNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-01-12· cited 16×
- Bezemek v. BalduiniNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1922-03-20· cited 14×
- Park v. MilliganNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-03-01· cited 12×
- First Western Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'nNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-06-23· cited 4×
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1938-01-29· cited 2×
- Ex parte MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1932-01-30· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.