Prichard Enterprises, Inc. v. Adkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that allega‐ tions that scores of calls due to the defendants’ conduct caused “annoyance and inconvenience” and were “disrup‐ tive” to the plaintiff’s personal life were sufficient to state a claim for intrusion upon seclusion under West Virginia law
• finding that allega‐ tions that scores of calls due to the defendants’ conduct caused “annoyance and inconvenience” and were “disrup‐ tive” to the plaintiff’s personal life were sufficient to state a claim for intrusion upon seclusion under West Virginia law
• listing West Virginia cases in which courts have permitted tortious interference claims in the context of employment relationships
• “The plaintiffs did not move to amend their complaint to include these new allegations or exhibits, and the court will not consider them for the purposes of resolving the pending motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).