Skip to main content
· 11/2/1994

Price v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF HONOLULU

Citations

  • 883 P.2d 629
  • 77 Haw. 168
  • 1994 Haw. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “penalties which accrue during the period in which liability is contested ‘are common.... They are valid, assuming the [appellant] is accorded adequate opportunity to challenge their assessment at the administrative level before payment must begin.’” (Citations omitted.
  • defining mixed questions of law and fact as conclusions of law that are “dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case”
  • defining mixed questions of law and fact as conclusions of law that are “dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case”
  • defining mixed questions of law and fact as conclusions of law that are \dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case\
  • applying the clearly erroneous standard of review to a mixed question of law and fact, defined as a conclusion “dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case”
  • \The basic elements of due process of law require notice and an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.