Tenth Circuit· 11/14/2000

Price v. Western Resources, Inc.

Citations

232 F.3d 779
48 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 261
2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 6234
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 28957
2000 WL 1701402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reiterating that a sufficient affidavit is a “prerequisite” to relief under Rule 56(d)
explaining that if the movant could obtain limited discovery through mere, general allegations of the non- movant potentially possessing information, “every summary judgment decision would have to be delayed while the non-movant goes fishing in the movant’s files.”
applying abuse of discretion standard to review a denial of a stay to take more discovery
referring to Rule 56(f), which was recodified as Rule 56(d) by amendments effective December 1, 2010
referring to Rule 56(f), which was recodified as Rule 56(d) by amendments effective December 1, 2010
addressing Rule 56(f), the previous version of Rule 56(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Anderson, Henry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.