Price v. Western Resources, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that a sufficient affidavit is a “prerequisite” to relief under Rule 56(d)
• explaining that if the movant could obtain limited discovery through mere, general allegations of the non- movant potentially possessing information, “every summary judgment decision would have to be delayed while the non-movant goes fishing in the movant’s files.”
• applying abuse of discretion standard to review a denial of a stay to take more discovery
• referring to Rule 56(f), which was recodified as Rule 56(d) by amendments effective December 1, 2010
• referring to Rule 56(f), which was recodified as Rule 56(d) by amendments effective December 1, 2010
• addressing Rule 56(f), the previous version of Rule 56(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).