Skip to main content

Price v. Taylor

Citations

  • 466 S.E.2d 87
  • 251 Va. 82
  • 1996 Va. LEXIS 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attorneys’ testimony that a contract was valid on its face because it recited legally adequate consideration was inadmissible under Code § 8.01-401.3(B
  • finding that mutual promises constituted consideration for a written land sale contract
  • excluding testimony from lawyers that there was adequate consideration in a contract
  • “[I]t is well established that mutual promises in a contract constitute valuable consideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrico, Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, Whiting

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.