Price v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affidavit stating that parole law was “brought up,” along with the length of time someone would have to stay in jail, was sufficient to require a hearing
• confession admissible even though defendant had I.Q. of 78, was illiterate and poorly educated
• confession admissible even though defendant had I.Q. of 78, was illiterate and poorly educated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Licon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2003-03-27· cited 66×
• Mendoza v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1996-12-04· cited 38×
• Price v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-25· cited 27×
• Culton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-31· cited 23×
• Price v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1993-02-10· cited 18×
• Goudeau v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-01-07· cited 9×
• Musgrove v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-01-27· cited 6×
• Jerald D. Clark v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-06-29
• Licon, Jr., Ernesto v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2003-03-27
• Kenneth Neal Weatherford v. State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2002-01-09