Skip to main content
· 3/8/2010

Price v. Reilly

Citations

  • 697 F. Supp. 2d 344
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20779
  • 2010 WL 889787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a plaintiff’s medication dosage claim failed because the plaintiff only alleged that an allegedly incorrect dosage was “wrong” and was “hurting” him
  • finding that a nine-month delay in arranging kidney transplant test and several months’ delay in conducting scheduled x-ray exam both adequately stated a claim for deliberate indifference
  • denying summary judgment where plaintiff repeatedly complained of injuries and defendants failed to address the injuries
  • [“t]he fact that defendants offered some treatment in response to plaintiff's complaints does not as a matter of law establish that they had no subjectively culpable intent.”
  • “The fact that defendants offered some treatment in response to plaintiff’s complaints does not as a matter of law establish that they had no subjectively culpable intent.”
  • [“t]he fact that 9 defendants offered some treatment in response to plaintiff's complaints does not as a matter of law establish that they had no subjectively culpable intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joseph F. Bianco

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.