Skip to main content
· 4/9/1996

Price v. Obayashi Hawaii Corp.

Citations

  • 914 P.2d 1364
  • 81 Haw. 171
  • 1996 Haw. LEXIS 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a dismissal without prejudice has the finality required for purposes of appellate jurisdiction
  • stating that an EIS must \enable the decision-maker to consider fully the environmental factors involved and to make a reasoned decision after balancing the risks of harm to the environment against the benefits to be derived from the proposed action\
  • stating that an EIS must “enable the decision-maker to consider fully the environmental factors involved and to make a reasoned decision after balancing the risks of harm to the environment against the benefits to be derived from the proposed action”
  • applying the rule of reason in reviewing an agency's determination that an EIS was sufficient
  • applying the rule of reason in reviewing an agency’s determination that an EIS was sufficient
  • applying the separate document rule to an order dismissing a complaint for want of prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.