Skip to main content
· 12/22/2011

Price v. Northern States Power Co.

Citations

  • 664 F.3d 1186
  • 2011 WL 6412428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that power plants are separate establishments where they did not have employees transfer between them, and have separate supervisors
  • finding that power plants 75 miles apart are separate establishments
  • “To establish a prima facie case of wage discrimination a [plaintiff] must provide ‘sufficient evidence’ that her “employer paid different salaries to men and women for equal work performed under similar conditions.”
  • three female employees failed to establish prima facie of wage discrimination; although some 12 In this case, Plaintiff has failed to present sufficient evidence to establish that her position as a Laboratory Technologist (020-1
  • “The women’s claims under the MHRA and Title VII are governed by the same standards as their EPA claim. Thus if summary judgment was proper on the women’s EPA claim, it was also proper on their . . . Title VII claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Bye, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.