Price v. Halstead

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no joint enterprise where driver and passengers had only the common purpose of drinking and joy riding
• holding that there was no joint enterprise where driver and passengers had only the common purpose of drinking and joy riding
• stating that a plaintiff must, “at a minimum . . . set forth sufficient information to outline the elements of [the] claim” in its complaint, and if it “fails to do so, dismissal is proper”
• discussing “aiding and abetting” under tort law noting that “[t]he basis for imposing liability under an aiding and abetting theory is that if the breach of duty by the actor was substantially encouraged by the conduct of a third party, then this party may also be found liable”
• passenger who assisted driver in becoming intoxicated was liable for the harm resulting from DUI
• passenger who assisted driver in becoming intoxicated was liable for the harm resulting from DUI

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).