Price v. Crone
Citations
- 44 Miss. 571
Syllabus
<p>1. Minors in chancery. — It is the duty of the chancellor to protect the interests of minors, whether the proper defense be made or not; and for this purpose, he should look to the record in all its parts, and, of his own motion, give to the infant the benefit of all objections and exceptions, as fully, as if specially pleaded. The infant can waive none of its rights.</p> <p>2. Guardian ad ditem — It is a settled rule, that a guardian ad litem cannot be designated till after service of process on the infant.</p> <p>3. Service on infant defendant — A return showing personal service on an infant defendant, is insufficient, unless it also show that the infant had no father or mother in this state. Code of 1857, 489. And the appointment of a guardian ad litem on such return, is error.</p> <p>4. Partition — Possession.—Partition of lands can only be made between persons in actual or constructive possession ; other claimants must establish their rights by suit, and obtain actual seisin before they can be in condition to demand a partition. Hence, a mortgagor in possesion, is the proper party to make partition with his co-tenant; and when the partition has been made, the mortgage on the previously undivided moiety attaches m severalty.</p>
Judges: Simball
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morgan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-08-15· cited 157×
- Natural Father v. United Meth. Child. HomeMississippi Supreme Court· 1982-08-18· cited 37×
- Quinn v. Mississippi State UniversityMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-07-02· cited 36×
- Adoption of D.N.T. v. R.D.H.Mississippi Supreme Court· 2003-04-24· cited 33×
- Clemons v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-02-11· cited 29×
- Thiroux Ex Rel. Cruz v. AustinMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-11-18· cited 29×
- Sharp v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1961-03-13· cited 19×
- Knight v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court· 1981-04-01· cited 18×
- Burt v. BurtMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-08-23· cited 12×
- Walker v. ReddingSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-01-15· cited 12×
- Adoption of JMM v. New Beginnings of Tupelo, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 7×
- Miller v. PalmerMississippi Supreme Court· 1877-10-15· cited 7×
- Spight v. WaldronMississippi Supreme Court· 1875-10-15· cited 4×
- Thweatt v. ThweattCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2009-02-24· cited 2×
- Daryl Leonard Morgan v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-10-01
- Mike Quinn v. Mississippi State UnivMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-10-14
- Shawndee Thiroux v. Jason W. AustinMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-08-11
- Kenneth Clemons, Jr. v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-03-12
- Bruce Burt v. Amber D. BurtMississippi Supreme Court· 2000-05-10
- In Re Adoption of DNTMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-04-24
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stephens v. Van BurenNew York Court of Chancery· 1829-05-25· cited 29×
- Jenkins v. Van SchaackNew York Court of Chancery· 1831-04-17· cited 26×
- Stone v. GoverSupreme Court of Alabama· 1840-01-15· cited 12×
- Briscoe v. AnketellMississippi Supreme Court· 1854-10-15· cited 12×
- Ingersoll v. IngersollMississippi Supreme Court· 1868-10-15· cited 10×
- Grant's heirs v. CraigmilesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1808-11-10· cited 4×
- Carothers v. HurleyMississippi Supreme Court· 1866-10-15· cited 3×
- Hotchkiss v. OliverNew York Supreme Court· 1848-05-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.