Price v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding defendant’s counsel had preserved trial court’s failure to make findings under KRS 439.3106 when voiding diversion but stating that the lack of findings would constitute palpable error if unpreserved
• concluding defendant’s counsel had preserved trial court’s failure to make findings under KRS 439.3106 when voiding diversion but stating that the lack of findings would constitute palpable error if unpreserved
• “Because the circuit court failed to make findings under both elements of KRS 439.3106(1), we may not review the sufficiency of the evidence for those findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bearden v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 1,941×
• Commonwealth v. English
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 1,274×
• Commonwealth v. Andrews
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2014-12-18· cited 117×
• McClure v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2015-03-13· cited 74×
• Commonwealth v. Marshall
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2011-08-25· cited 23×
• Lucas v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2012-09-21· cited 5×