Supreme Court of Virginia· 1/14/1974
Price v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 201 S.E.2d 798
- 214 Va. 490
- 1974 Va. LEXIS 165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “[a] portrayal of nudity is not, as a matter of law, a sufficient basis for finding that [it] is obscene”
- stating the “portrayal of nudity is not, as a matter of law, a sufficient basis for a finding Page 112 Cite as 29 I&N Dec. 110 (BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4104 that a work is obscene” (citing House, 169 S.E.2d at 577)
- “A portrayal of nudity is not, as a matter of law, a sufficient basis for finding that [it] is obscene.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cochran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-04-23· cited 58×
- State v. WelkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-03-01· cited 52×
- People v. NeumayerMichigan Supreme Court· 1979-02-05· cited 47×
- State v. ManzoHawaii Supreme Court· 1977-11-23· cited 36×
- Hart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-03-22· cited 33×
- West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-13· cited 27×
- State v. MOTION PICTURE ENTITLED\ THE BET\Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-03-06· cited 26×
- State v. De SantisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1974-08-06· cited 26×
- State v. PhillipsUtah Supreme Court· 1975-09-15· cited 15×
- Allman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-05-25· cited 13×
- Kent County Prosecutor v. Robert Emmett Goodrich Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1974-05-02· cited 13×
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-04-09· cited 11×
- State v. Allen & RosebaughCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1977-02-25· cited 9×
- Wall Distributors, Inc. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1984-11-30· cited 9×
- National Capital Naturists, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsFourth Circuit· 1989-06-15· cited 7×
- Prison Legal News v. StolleE.D. Virginia· 2015-03-31· cited 6×
- National Capital Naturists, Inc. v. Board Of Supervisors Of Accomack County, VirginiaFourth Circuit· 1989-07-19· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. SimonePortsmouth County Circuit Court· 2003-10-10· cited 3×
- American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc. v. SchiffD. New Mexico· 1986-11-03· cited 2×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 1,264×
- United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. FilmSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 524×
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis and Peachtree News Company, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1973-11-15· cited 72×
- People v. EnskatCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1973-08-08· cited 37×
- Easterling v. WaltonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1967-09-08· cited 35×
- House v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1969-09-05· cited 21×
- Price v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1972-06-12· cited 18×
- Alexander v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1972-01-17· cited 10×
- Upton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1970-11-30· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.