Skip to main content

Price v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 201 S.E.2d 798
  • 214 Va. 490
  • 1974 Va. LEXIS 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[a] portrayal of nudity is not, as a matter of law, a sufficient basis for finding that [it] is obscene”
  • stating the “portrayal of nudity is not, as a matter of law, a sufficient basis for a finding Page 112 Cite as 29 I&N Dec. 110 (BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4104 that a work is obscene” (citing House, 169 S.E.2d at 577)
  • “A portrayal of nudity is not, as a matter of law, a sufficient basis for finding that [it] is obscene.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.