Price v. All American Engineering Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it is impermissible for a court “to imbue a statute with a meaning in excess of, or contrary to, legislative design[.]”
• a supplemental plan, quite similar to the Maryland law involved in the present case, was held not to violate the Due Process Clause
• a supplemental plan, quite similar to the Maryland law involved in the present case, was held not to violate the Due Process Clause
• retroactive effect must be mandated by unmistakable legislative intent
• involving the Workmen’s Compensation Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).