Preyer v. Saukhla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming finding that claimant’s diabetes did not meet section 9.08 where claimant had “nearly normal neurologic examination”
• 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) provides the court with the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the case for a rehearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).