Skip to main content
· 1/22/1992

Prewitt v. North Coast Village, Ltd. (In Re North Coast Village, Ltd.)

Citations

  • 135 B.R. 641
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 1975
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1240
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 140
  • 22 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 874
  • 1992 WL 19982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • automatic stay did not prevent adversary proceedings against debtor in bankruptcy court in which debtor’s bankruptcy was pending
  • “we conclude that the automatic stay does not apply to proceedings against the debtor in home bankruptcy court”
  • “[W]e conclude that the automatic stay does not apply to proceedings against the debtor in home bankruptcy court....”
  • “the stay and provisions for relief from the stay vest in the bankruptcy court control over which collection efforts will be allowed to go forward and the extent to which the debtor or the estate will bear the burden or cost of defending against those collection efforts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perris, Russell, Ollason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.