Previto v. Ryobi North America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where “there is simply too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered, the opinion is speculative and should be stricken” because it is “unhelpful to the trier of fact.”
• excluding human factors expert's testimony based upon insufficient facts and data

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).