Prevette v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Decided before the statute was enacted. The plaintiff had wide discretion to present rebuttal testimony to contradict the defendant's testimony. The court used the term \evidence\ to refer to rebuttal \testimony\ that did not include any \physical evidence.\
• Decided before the statute was enacted. The plaintiff had wide discretion to present rebuttal testimony to contradict the defendant's testimony. The court used the term \evidence\ to refer to rebuttal \testimony\ that did not include any \physical evidence.\
• Decided before the statute was enacted. The plaintiff had wide discretion to present rebuttal testimony to contradict the defendant's testimony. The court used the term \evidence\ to refer to rebuttal \testimony\ that did not include any \physical evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).