Preuss v. Stevens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court’s entry of summary judgment prior to acceptance of an offer of judgment renders the offer ineffectual for any purpose
• holding that a court’s “decision on a motion for summary judgment prior to acceptance [of offer of judgment] destroys the purposes for which the rule was designed and we hold that the offer of judgment was ineffectual for any purpose.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).