Pretzel & Stouffer, Chartered v. Imperial Adjusters, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that entry of default was proper where party did not file its answer or attend a status hearing, and further affirming entry of default judgment
• holding entry of default proper where party did not file its answer or attend a status hearing
• holding entry of default proper where party did not file its answer or attend a status hearing
• holding it was unnecessary to consider whether a meritorious defense existed and whether the corrective action was quick enough where the litigant failed to show good cause
• stating that “[t]he district court will be found to have abused its discretion [in ruling on a Rule 55(c) motion] only if we conclude that ‘no reasonable person’ could agree with its judgment”
• affirming district court's denial of motion to set aside default when defendant demonstrated \no good cause\ for its default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).