Preston v. Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “in evaluating motions to compel arbitration, ‘courts treat the facts as they would in ruling on a summary judgment.’” (quoting Kovac v. Superior Dairy, Inc., 930 F. Supp. 2d 857, 864 (N.D. Ohio 2013))
• “in evaluating motions to compel arbitration, ‘courts treat the facts as they would in ruling on a summary judgment.’ ” (quoting Kovac v. Superior Dairy, Inc., 930 F. Supp. 2d 857, 864 (N.D. Ohio 2013))
• “in evaluating motions to compel arbitration, ‘courts treat the facts as they would in ruling on a summary judgment.’ ” (quoting Kovac v. Superior Dairy, Inc., 930 F. Supp. 2d 857, 864 (N.D. Ohio 2013))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).