· 12/27/1990
Preston v. Virginia
Citations
- 779 F. Supp. 45
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19978
- 61 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,150
- 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1536
- 1990 WL 316216
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding plaintiff acted diligently in moving to amend the complaint following expiration of scheduling order deadline upon learning new, relevant facts in discovery
- “[The defendant] will not have to expend significant additional resources because the same claims in the original complaint are being alleged against the new parties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Turk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.