Skip to main content

Preston v. State

Citations

  • 303 Ark. 106
  • 792 S.W.2d 599
  • 1990 Ark. LEXIS 370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Because the trial court had not yet ruled on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel raised in a motion for new trial, there was no appealable order entered on the issue.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.