Skip to main content
· 8/1/1986

Preston v. Kruezer

Citations

  • 641 F. Supp. 1163
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21940

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Act expressly provides for situations where it might collide with other state or federal statutory schemes by making conformity with such schemes an affirmative defense to Consumer Fraud Act suits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roszkowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.