Skip to main content
· 1/9/1813

Preston v. Englert

Citations

  • 5 Binn. 390
  • 1813 Pa. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on later negotiations between the parties to show that “many material terms had not been settled”
  • noting party did not act in reliance on contract and despite several rounds of drafts, the record indicates that having a written agreement was important to the plaintiff
  • “An agreement to reach an agreement is a contradiction in terms and imposes no obligation on the parties thereto”
  • “An agreement to reach an agreement is a contradiction in terms and imposes no obligation on the parties thereto”
  • a contract to create a commercial tenancy failed to materialize for lack of both present intent and important terms
  • “An agreement to reach an agreement is a contradiction in terms and imposes no obligation on the parties thereto”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.