· 1/9/1813
Preston v. Englert
Citations
- 5 Binn. 390
- 1813 Pa. LEXIS 4
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relying on later negotiations between the parties to show that “many material terms had not been settled”
- noting party did not act in reliance on contract and despite several rounds of drafts, the record indicates that having a written agreement was important to the plaintiff
- “An agreement to reach an agreement is a contradiction in terms and imposes no obligation on the parties thereto”
- “An agreement to reach an agreement is a contradiction in terms and imposes no obligation on the parties thereto”
- a contract to create a commercial tenancy failed to materialize for lack of both present intent and important terms
- “An agreement to reach an agreement is a contradiction in terms and imposes no obligation on the parties thereto”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.