Skip to main content
· 5/29/1963

Preston v. Denkins

Citations

  • 382 P.2d 686
  • 94 Ariz. 214
  • 1963 Ariz. LEXIS 305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the power of a court to vacate or modify a judgment is governed by the Rules of Civil Procedure
  • serving party must show jurisdictional fact that residence is unknown, not merely allege the residence is unknown to the plaintiff
  • observing that the “right to challenge a judgment on the ground that it is void for lack of jurisdiction . . . does not depend upon rules of the court or statute. . . . Statutes of limitations have no application to void judgments”
  • “The jurisdiction of the court to enter any judgment must rest on the affidavit in support of service by publication.”
  • “The jurisdiction of the court to enter any judgment must rest on the affidavit in support of service by publication.”
  • due diligence in determining allegedly unknown residence of defendant as a fact is prerequisite to the jurisdiction of court to enter a default judgment upon service by publication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockwood, Bernstein, Udall, Struckmeyer, Jennings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.