Preston Carter Co. v. Tatum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting remittitur of exemplary damages where jury probably considered improper items of compensatory damages, but evidence supported some amount of exemplary damages after application of Kraus factors
• jury probably considered “improper and highly speculative” elements of damages in assessing exemplary damage amount; therefore, amount of exemplary damages should be reduced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).