Skip to main content
· 5/13/1997

Presto v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Citations

  • 487 S.E.2d 70
  • 226 Ga. App. 547
  • 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 1944
  • 33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 418
  • 1997 Ga. App. LEXIS 639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • manufacturer of prescription drugs had no duty to warn patient directly of dangers in its use
  • the manufacturer of a prescription drug is not normally required to directly warn the patient of dangers in its use
  • pharmacist was “enti tied to summary judgment on the [UCC] warranty claim because it neither manufactured nor prescribed the subject drug”
  • pharmacist was \entitled to summary judgment on the [UCC] warranty claim because it neither manufactured nor prescribed the subject drug\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburn, Pope, Johnson, Hancock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.