· 5/13/1997
Presto v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.
Citations
- 487 S.E.2d 70
- 226 Ga. App. 547
- 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 1944
- 33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 418
- 1997 Ga. App. LEXIS 639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- manufacturer of prescription drugs had no duty to warn patient directly of dangers in its use
- the manufacturer of a prescription drug is not normally required to directly warn the patient of dangers in its use
- pharmacist was “enti tied to summary judgment on the [UCC] warranty claim because it neither manufactured nor prescribed the subject drug”
- pharmacist was \entitled to summary judgment on the [UCC] warranty claim because it neither manufactured nor prescribed the subject drug\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackburn, Pope, Johnson, Hancock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.