Pressman v. Wolf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A buyer’s recovery was denied where she “had the opportunity to discover all that she complained about” in her action against the sellers.
• buyer’s misrepresentation claim, which was premised on seller’s failure to disclose known defects, was barred under Johnson because “the home’s defects were readily observable and/or within the buyer’s ability to know or easily discover”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).