Pressman v. Nellis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a partner may be convicted of embezzling partnership property
• party who argued that action was quasi in rem was precluded from arguing at a later stage in the litigation that the action was in personam
• the phrase “goods, wares, merchandise” in 18 U.S.C. § 2314 comprehends all personal property that is “ordinarily a subject of commerce”
• comment on right to counsel reversible error on the facts
• comment on right to counsel reversible error on the facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).