Skip to main content
· 4/15/1873

Pressly v. Ellis

Citations

  • 48 Miss. 574

Syllabus

<p>1. Trustee and cestui que trust. — It is no less a rule of law than the suggestion of natural justice, that an agent or trustee holding a confidential relation, whether under the law of the land or by appointment by an individual,, shall conduct the business of liis trust with fidelity to him or those for whom he acts, and follow the line of duty prescribed for him by the appointing power.</p> <p>2. Trustees of township school lands. — Under the act of congress of March 3, 1803, which <e reserved the 16th sections in each township for the ^upport of schools therein,the trustees are authorized to lease the lands, upon the terms therein stated, to raise a fund to give practical and beneficial effect to the grant; and it was the intention of the act to avoid, as far as the utmost prudence could suggest, the hazard of loss by insolvent lessees. The trustees, on leasing the land, are required to taire such security as they may approve, and the law raises a special mortgage security on the land, and forbids conveyance till payment. Wherefore, a conveyance under any circumstances, before payment actually made, does not discharge the land of its lien ; and even a purchaser from the lessee, without notice, will not be protected against tho lien.</p> <p>3. Same. — The leased premises being liable, under the act of congress, for payment of the money for the lease, even when sold for value to an innocent purchaser without notice, a fortiori the premises are liable when the lessee is himself one of the trustees, and combined with his fellows in the board to violate the trust.</p> <p>4. Same — bankruptcy—jurisdiction.—The bankruptcy of the lessee or purchaser of the 16 th section school lands does not alter the case, either as to the liability of the property to the lien for the lease money, or the jurisdiction of the state court over the person or subject-matter.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “under federal case law FELA is to be given a liberal construction in favor of injured railroad employees so that it may accomplish its humanitarian and remedial purposes.”
  • stating that \under federal case law FELA is to be given a liberal construction in favor of injured railroad employees so that it may accomplish its humanitarian and remedial purposes.\
  • rejecting BNSF’s motion to dismiss an out-of-state FELA plaintiffs claim notwithstanding the doctrine of forum non conveniens and § 25-2-201, MCA
  • rejecting BNSF’s motion to dismiss an out-of-state FELA plaintiff’s claim notwithstanding the doctrine of forum non conveniens and § 25-2-201, MCA
  • rejecting BNSF’s motion to dismiss an out-of-state FELA plaintiff’s claim notwithstanding the doctrine of forum non conveniens and § 25-2-201, MCA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Slmrall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.