Pressed Prism Glass Co. v. Continuous Glass Prism Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a Magistrate Judge’s Order that delayed the production of surreptitiously tape-recorded conversations until after depositions
• upholding magistrate ruling in antitrust case to delay production of audio recordings given plaintiff’s interest “in determining the present unrefreshed recollection of such persons”
• affirming protective order requiring disclosure of surreptitiously recorded telephone conversations with defendants only after their depositions had been taken, and finding that plaintiffs interest in determining witness’ present unrefreshed recollection outweighed any prejudice to defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).