Skip to main content
· 1/17/1989

Presock v. Davis

Citations

  • 1 Pa. D. & C.4th 218
  • 1989 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even when a report was prepared by a non-testifying expert, it was subject to discovery when it was needed for effective cross-examination of a testifying expert who relied on it in reaching his opinion
  • holding that even when a report was prepared by a non-testifying expert, it was subject to discovery when it was needed for effective cross-examination of a testifying expert who relied on it in reaching his opinion
  • non-testifying expert's report necessary to cross-examination of testifying expert who relied on report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grimes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.