Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a jury award of lost profits necessarily implied a jury finding of lost market share and thus irreparable harm
• holding that patentee must show “a reasonable probability that the sales would have been made ‘but for’ the infringement”
• holding that the patentee demonstrated irreparable harm where it was forced to compete for the same customers in the same markets as its infringer
• holding that the patentee demonstrated irreparable harm where it was forced to compete for the same customers in the same markets as its infringer
• concluding that a jury award of lost profits necessarily implied a jury finding of lost market share and thus irreparable harm
• holding that the patentee, a manufacturer of electrical components, demonstrated irreparable harm where it was forced to compete for the same customers in the same markets as its infringer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).