President of the Lewiston Falls Bank v. Leonard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding majority rule \fully consistent with [Kentucky's] prior holdings adverse to contractual provisions tending to restrain the alienability of choses in action\
• finding majority rule \fully consistent with [Kentucky's] prior holdings adverse to contractual provisions tending to restrain the alienability of choses in action\
• “In the absence of ambiguity, a written instrument will be enforced strictly according to its terms, and a court will interpret the contract’s terms by assigning language its ordinary meaning and without resort to extrinsic evidence.”
• “[I]n the absence of ambiguity a written instrument will be enforced strictly according to its terms, and a court will interpret the contract’s terms by assigning language its ordinary meaning and without resort to extrinsic evidence.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).