Skip to main content
· 8/16/1961

Prescott v. Erwin

Citations

  • 133 So. 2d 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striking down legislation that regulated surplus farm equipment and products, and allowed certain counties to eliminate the position of Jury Commissioner
  • rejecting the proposed subjects “amendments to the county code” or “powers of county commissioners” as (continued…
  • rejecting the government’s unifying subject framed as “powers of county commissioners”
  • rejecting “powers of county commissioners” as too broad a subject
  • provisions of statute allowing for sale of surplus farm (continued...
  • “The addition of a completely unrelated legislative operation to the bill under the auspices of ‘powers of county commissioners’ could only have survived the instant single subject challenge ‘if the point of view [were] carried back far enough’ to eviscerate the rule.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Icanner, Shannon, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.