· 8/16/1961
Prescott v. Erwin
Citations
- 133 So. 2d 332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking down legislation that regulated surplus farm equipment and products, and allowed certain counties to eliminate the position of Jury Commissioner
- rejecting the proposed subjects “amendments to the county code” or “powers of county commissioners” as (continued…
- rejecting the government’s unifying subject framed as “powers of county commissioners”
- rejecting “powers of county commissioners” as too broad a subject
- provisions of statute allowing for sale of surplus farm (continued...
- “The addition of a completely unrelated legislative operation to the bill under the auspices of ‘powers of county commissioners’ could only have survived the instant single subject challenge ‘if the point of view [were] carried back far enough’ to eviscerate the rule.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Icanner, Shannon, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.