Prescott v. Darby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the parties’ “exchange of e-mails, which did not set forth the fee for plaintiff’s services or an objective standard to determine it, was too indefinite to be enforceable”
• holding that the parties’ “exchange of e-mails, which did not set forth the fee for plaintiff’s services or an objective standard to determine it, was too indefinite to be enforceable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).