Prescott & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Hopkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the evidence pertaining to chlamydia was not unduly prejudicial in part because it was “probative of the fact that” the victim “had the type of sexual contact with an individual necessary to transmit the infection”
• affirming the trial court’s refusal to strike evidence of chlamydia in the child victim of sexual abuse even where there was no direct evidence linking the defendant’s chlamydia to the victim’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).