Skip to main content
· 5/18/1914

Prescott & Northwestern Railroad v. Thomas

Citations

  • 114 Ark. 56
  • 167 S.W. 486
  • 1914 Ark. LEXIS 567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an IDEA request for fee awards and fees-on-fees litigation should be considered part of the same action for the purposes of the IDEA’s fee cap
  • reiterating that an IDEA administrative action and ensuing litigation for attorneys’ fees a plaintiff seeks after prevailing in that administrative action “comprise[s] the same action for the purposes of the IDEA and the Appropriations Act fee-cap”
  • reiterating that an IDEA administrative action and ensuing litigation for attorneys’ fees a plaintiff seeks after prevailing in that administrative action “comprise[s] the same action for the purposes of the IDEA and the Appropriations Act fee-cap”
  • “If the parent wins in district court after losing in the administrative hearing, the parent is eligible to recover attorney’s fees and costs expended in litigating the controversy from beginning to end.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCulloch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.