Presbytery of Seattle v. King County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding if regulation does not infringe upon fundamental attribute of ownership and it protects public from harm, court should analyze regulation for reasonableness under substantive due process, not takings
• stating that a takings challenge and a substantive due process challenge are alternatives and should be analyzed separately
• holding if regulation does not infringe upon fundamental attribute of ownership and it protects public from harm, court should analyze regulation for reasonableness under substantive due process, not takings
• dismissing as not ripe the claim of a landowner who failed to seek permits before challenging regulatory action
• dismissing as not ripe the claim of a landowner who failed to seek permits before challenging regulatory action
• applying the “final decision” requirement in the context of the exhaustion/futility doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).